|
baseballnolie34 (August 20, 2008 at 6:59 am)
Having studied charter school propaganda in Chicago, I really doubt she wasn't aware of the differences.In addition, you've got to make sure they're selecting kids randomly and comparing apples to apples. In most cases, charters don't take the kids with behavioral or family problems, often taking a self-selected group instead. So when someone says the population is "underprivileged" or "poverty-stricken" at a charter school, turn on your bullshit meter and ask some serious questions.
tephinnie (June 8, 2008 at 9:21 pm)
In a telephone interview, the Harvard researcher acknowledged that she had used misleading data to measure the proficiency of public school students in the District, resulting in an unfair comparison with the charters. She attributed the mix-up to the difficulty of downloading data from different Web sites. New data provided by Hoxby showed a 7.4 percent advantage for the charter schools in math proficiency rather than a 40 percent advantage.
IreneK97 (May 4, 2008 at 12:46 am)
this sucks
legendy2j (March 15, 2008 at 11:21 pm)
wow your language is fucked up.
tremaynephillips (March 1, 2008 at 12:23 am)
chater skolls rule excpellisaly cics wrightwood |
