DarkGhost57 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

This movie wasn't all that bad. I mean, the plot definately could have been better, but for the type of movie it is, its not bad. It isn't as much of a horror movie as it is of a gore film. It makes you cringe alot more than jump, it's just pretty sick.I found it's mindless violence mildly entertaining.

Swedish666787 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

shit movie

AdrenalineAndLove (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

No kidding? It wasn't used because zombies would've been too unrealistic. A disease instead, that's actually a lot more realistic. Hostel wasn't scary either, it's just gore. 28 Days Later wasn't scary at all.

ReikileaSK (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

nope, they did not...Why would we do that?? we dont want shitty directors here...Film ctitics here would really torture him ..:D

neilyp85 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

The word zombie werent used once in 28 days later. Scarier and better in every single department than hostel. Anyone could make a film like hostel. People killing people in a dungeon woah original.

thegoodfella1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

they actually have theses in europe

xoBeautySparkzxo (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

This movie is sick. When I say sick, I mean psychotically sick. How can a human being do something sooo sick to another human being???

ginocidian (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

errrrrr.............stop complaining my big brother is alive. stop complaining

ta6yLMAO (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

everthing about this movie suck ... and its not inspired po "true events" ... I've been in Bratislava and there's no suck thing as "the hotel castle of your nightmares where you pay to torture" XD everyone who likes these crapy movies should get a life ... saw is way better

byrzynski (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

fuckin stupid film kórwwa fix ,żeby taki kibel w kinach dawaćnie dziwne że mamy tyle psycholi na wolności