|
TheRealArchAngel (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
**I've just found most arguments are easily refuted with simple facts**Well, these "end of the world from Industialization and using oil and coal" fuckers have always been around since the 50's but have only been widely heard with the age of the Internet and Global media...enough to have the politicans try to get their and anyone gubllible enough to believes them votes.None of the bullshit they preach stands up to any feild or lab tests which is they use consensus in place of facts
TheRealArchAngel (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
**Explain something to me - in another video on youtube they said the graph with solar activity/warming comparison said that it drops off 20 years ago and after that part where it's left out, the solar activity goes in one direction while temperature goes in the opposite direction. What's going on with that one?**The Graphs are actually showing the 11 year phases of 33 year cycles of -10,-5,+5,and +10degrees in any area that the Mayans and almost every other ancient culture knew & wrote about
TheRealArchAngel (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
3) belive it or not IR rays and Heat are 2 separate things. Ait doesn't capture heat for IR rays converting to heat in the ait, Air is hjeated from the heat coming of off the surface heated by Ir rays absorb by surface4) In real green house the IR rays pass through the Glass ,it's the heat from the green house surface that is trapped5) Likewise, air is transparent to IR rays includinging it's "GHG" component, but will conduct heat from surface as all gases can asorb heat
TheRealArchAngel (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
**GHG theory" suggests that certain gases act like the panes of glsas causing partial refraction & absorbtion of heat and IR in a "ping pong" cycle...which is wrong**why?cause1 If the "GHG gases" were as deflective as they suggest the IR rays would have never reach the earth surface where the Heat is actually generated2)None of the GHGs can absorb more then a few degrees of IR as heat, & 99.99% of the Heat in Air is transfered from the Earth surface into the air via water vapour...period
TheRealArchAngel (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
**I was always wondering about that, people call it greenhouse gas but I wondered whether it was supposed to act like an insulation or whatever**Well, even a green house don't work via "GHG theory"...lol.the Glass panels in older Green Houses or the black mesh in newer ones trap the heat in the Green house not the gases in it."GHG theory" suggests that certain gases act like the panes of glsas causing partial refraction & absorbtion of heat and IR in a "ping pong" cycle...which is wrong
quuaa1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I was always wondering about that, people call it greenhouse gas but I wondered whether it was supposed to act like an insulation or whatever. It's another thing that someone was going to have to explain to me very slowly and simplified.
JanLauGe (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
If I got this right, in my opinion it would mean, that people that were talking about a natural ice age in the 1960s were basically right; but this effect was now "masked" my anthropogenic (thus non natural) warming. Sounds very dangerous to me, because when thinking about the impacts of pollution without having this fact in mind, we could easily underestimate the greenhouse effect.
quuaa1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Explain something to me - in another video on youtube they said the graph with solar activity/warming comparison said that it drops off 20 years ago and after that part where it's left out, the solar activity goes in one direction while temperature goes in the opposite direction. What's going on with that one? I'm in no means a global warming believer, I've just found most arguments are easily refuted with simple facts, this one is slightly more stubborn.
TheRealArchAngel (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
even IF there was a greater quantity **of Carbon monooxide (CO) exhausted from burning fossile fuels (in fact it few in car engines and very few in carbon power plants) it would be rapidly oxidized when released into the athmosphere.**Actually Carbon Monoxide or "Coal Gas" is stable and doesn't oxidize to C02...even if it could get past modern filtration systems. Likewise CO2 is captured as a Solid from catalyst converters post 1994...so how does all this CO and CO2 get pass modern filters?
TheRealArchAngel (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
p.s.Modern filtration systems not only capture most of the CO in combustion engines and furnace but those that have catalyst converters in their filtration system catchCO2 as a solid.It's a house of hards "Faith" thing the Environuts are preaching as technology is Cleaner then it was in the &0's or even the90's but all they still do is bitch and moan about the technology itself.The most extreme want us to go back to living in caves and swinging from trees,don't you know...lol |
