borisk2244 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

youtube comments are not meant to be a forum on "issues facing america". We were talking about the specific claim that obama is a socialist. I denied it. You ridiculed me. I questioned you. You agreed with my position. So I asked the obvious: why did you ridicule me. You refused to answer & started lecturing all of youtube about all the other reasons you're anti-Obama, which have nothing to do with why you ridiculed me for stating a position you agree with. And you still haven't answered.

jno9275 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Bro, do you even realize you are no longer talking about issues facing America but just trying to insult me. Now that is ignorance. You have not even been able to go against one of my arguments on issues facing America. are you serious, I feel really bad for you. If you don't realize the ignorance of your arguments then you are completely ridicoulous

borisk2244 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

the Laffer curve is a well-known function relating the number of keystrokes of this guy on youtube named jno9275 to the amount of laughter experienced by anyone reading his "arguments". It's an exponential relationship.

jno9275 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Thank you, once again for the insult. I would love to argue with you face to face where you wouldn't even dare say dumb things like that. LOL. You obviously don't know anything about economics. I suggest you go by a book and read then argue with me about. Learn what the Laffer Curve is? The real definition of a recession? and the definition of Economics? Then, I will listen to your dumb ass rhetoric.

borisk2244 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

AHHHH. So now it's not that I actually said it, it's that you "interpreted it that way".LOL

borisk2244 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

"Obama and Mccain whose tax policies differ by 3% which means their policies do not matter. Fact, undeniable."So you're saying that if A is no different than B, it logically follows that neither A nor B will have an effect on C. I.e., they "will not matter". That's what you're saying? LOL.It's like saying that since an M-4 and AK-47 don't really differ in their ability to put a hole in your head, they wouldn't have an effect on killing you. It's official. You're dumb as a rock.

jno9275 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

and then just arrogantly saying you are winning the argument when it is clear you are losing. Which is why you are also calling me all kinds of names and gettig angry. Simply, because you are losing and want to live in denial about it. I don't want 500$ please stop being an Idiot. I interpreted it that way. It is my opinion that you said that because you did. Don't want to believe then don't. I don't care. Bye

jno9275 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

One last comment before I'm done with you, because this argument is over. I think you need to think about who is winning the argument because I layed out Mccains plans and showed how they would work better, you only disagreed with them with dumb arrogant rhetoric. Never once gave Obama's plans, so I think it is clear of who is winning the argument. I think you need to stop being an arrogant fool and instead when you argue, argue issues that you agree with rather than just disagreeing with others

borisk2244 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

for the 2nd time, "notioned" is not a word in this context. I suggest you learn how to speak english before calling other people ignorant ... in english.find the comment where I "notioned" that you called Obama a socialist, quote it, and I'll paypal you $500.

jno9275 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

You are a ridicously ignorant person? You just take others people arguments and turn them around to your interpretation which is wrong and say they said something else. The only person who is pitiful is you. You notioned that I called obama a socialist. If you don't know what that means go look up you fucking moron.