MCK35 (September 5, 2008 at 7:50 pm)

They actually believed this was based on a true story although it's cleared up in the credits that it's made up.

migfa17 (September 5, 2008 at 2:47 pm)

Both of you critics should realize that this movie is 12 YEARS OLD! Giving away the plot???Jeeezzzzzz........!

mnuez (September 4, 2008 at 3:24 pm)

Movie reviews, trailers and DVD back covers suck balls. I'm exceedingly pleased about the fact that I just saw this movie without a shred of prior knowledge about it except that it was famous for some reason. THAT'S the way I hope to see all of the "greats" so that I can judge them for myself (Citizen Kane, for example, failed to impress this Gen-Xer, while Dr. Strangelove did).In any case, my own review of the film is pretty precisely what Siskel and Ebert said so I won't bother repeating it.

kingelnino9 (September 4, 2008 at 9:14 am)

And why is that??? Its a rubbish movie and there a long list of people who have bought into this rubbish. YAH YAH YAH

RuthlessRetard (September 3, 2008 at 10:49 pm)

Your a fucking dumbass.. Your opinion is worth less than dog shit.

cofffcofff (September 2, 2008 at 11:04 pm)

the movies they should be remembered for are Barton Fink, The Big Lebowski, Fargo and No Country for Old Men.

StealthMaster86 (September 2, 2008 at 7:20 am)

No country for old men is brillent and can't wait to see Burn After Reading. Fargo is an awesome movie.

boomaga (August 31, 2008 at 6:24 am)

He loved this, and hated O Brother Where Art Thou... pah

FunBoy15 (August 31, 2008 at 4:27 am)

perfecto.

2ndAsstJizzMopper (August 29, 2008 at 7:31 am)

", but this is a horrible review. Just giving away the plot"man, you said it. nothing to better fuck a great movie before you see it than listening to ebert drone on, complete with spoilers. what an ass. WTF detail _won't_ he give away?